Search for Indicators
Smoke/Tobacco-Free Protection in Multi-Unit Public Housing Complexes
Tobacco Use
Smoke/Tobacco-Free Protection in Multi-Unit Public Housing Complexes
Increasing the number of Multi-Unit Public Housing Complexes with Smoke and Tobacco-Free Policies
Cigarette smoking exposes non-smoking individuals to secondhand smoke (SHS), contributes to litter and pollution, and poses a fire risk. Exposure to SHS causes an estimated 33,951 annual deaths from heart disease and 7,333 annual deaths from lung cancer. Furthermore, exposure to SHS paces children at risk fro multiple respiratory infections, asthma and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).
Elderly individuals are particularly susceptible to SHS within the home. Elders exposed to SHS are at increased risk for:
- Asthma
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- Lung Cancer
- Complications of Heart Disease
- Other chronic respiratory symptoms
Key Tobacco and Housing Related Indicators
Baseline and Post-Assessment Findings and Analysis
Goal: Determine the barriers to and effectiveness of smoke/tobacco-free policies in public multi-unit housing complexes in decreasing tobacco related illnesses and complications.
-
Evalution Work Plan:
Completed
In Progress
Not StartedFinalize Evaluation Plan Obtain IRB approval/exemption Collect baseline data from multi-unit housing (MUH) complexes to examine demographics and initial opinions regarding smoke/tobacco-free MUH complexes Analyze baseline data Disseminate baseline data to stakeholders and on PICH webpage Collect follow-up data in MUH complexes that implemented smoke/tobacco-free "house rules"Analyze follow-up data Disseminate findings, including both baseline and follow-up data, and conclusions -
1. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2006.2. US Department of Health and Human Services. The health and consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.3. Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P, et al. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001; 11: 231-252.4. US Department of Health and Human Services. How tobacco smoke causes disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable diseases: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2010.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Miami-Dade
Health / Tobacco Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Electronic Vaping: Lifetime
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Electronic Vaping: Lifetime
19.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(19.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Electronic Vaping: Past 30 Days
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Electronic Vaping: Past 30 Days
10.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Smokeless Tobacco: Lifetime
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Smokeless Tobacco: Lifetime
1.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(3.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Miami-Dade Adolescents who Use Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
0.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(1.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Miami-Dade Adults Who Currently Use E-Cigarettes
County: Miami-Dade Adults Who Currently Use E-Cigarettes
3.8%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(7.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
County: Miami-Dade Adults who Smoke
County: Miami-Dade Adults who Smoke
12.0%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(14.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Miami-Dade High School Students who Smoked Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Miami-Dade High School Students who Smoked Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
3.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(2.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Miami-Dade Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Miami-Dade Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
38.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
FL Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Florida counties.
FL Value
(53.8)
The regional value is compared to the Florida State value.
Prior Value
(40.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
